{"id":196,"date":"2022-02-22T05:30:45","date_gmt":"2022-02-22T05:30:45","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/publications.clpr.org.in\/re-imagining-bail-decision-making\/?post_type=front-matter&p=196"},"modified":"2022-02-22T05:30:45","modified_gmt":"2022-02-22T05:30:45","slug":"list-of-tables-and-figures","status":"publish","type":"front-matter","link":"https:\/\/publications.clpr.org.in\/re-imagining-bail-decision-making\/front-matter\/list-of-tables-and-figures\/","title":{"rendered":"List of Tables and Figures"},"content":{"raw":"LIST OF TABLES <\/strong>\r\n\r\nTable 1: Overview of the number of cases observed\r\n\r\nTable 2: Overview of the number of case records obtained\r\n\r\nTable 3: Education Profile of under-trial Prisoners in Karnataka in 2015\r\n\r\nTable 4: Religious Profile of under-trial prisoners in Karnataka in 2015\r\n\r\nTable 5: Caste profile of under-trial prisoners in Karnataka in 2015\r\n\r\nTable 6: Overview of first productions study\r\n\r\nTable 7: Number of IPC and SLL cases\r\n\r\nTable 8: Accused informed of free legal aid\r\n\r\nTable 9: Number of bail applications filed\r\n\r\nTable 10: Accused in handcuffs and outcome\r\n\r\nTable 11: Median time and Average time spent by the judge in each district\r\n\r\nTable 12: Other outcomes observed in the pre-trial study (only Court Records)\r\n\r\nTable 13: Number of accused in the pre-trial stage\r\n\r\n
\r\n\r\nLIST OF FIGURES<\/strong>\r\n\r\nFigure a: Average crime rate per district in Karnataka from 2010-13\r\n\r\nFigure b: Under-trial prisoners in Karnataka (2010-2015)\r\n\r\nFigure c: Details of under-trials released on bail in Karnataka (2010 \u2013 2015)\r\n\r\nFigure d: Number of reported crimes in Karnataka (2010-2015)\r\n\r\nFigure e: Number of arrests in Karnataka (2010-2015)\r\n\r\nFigure f: Total number of arrests in Karnataka categorised offence-wise (2010-2015)\r\n\r\nFigure g: District-wise reported IPC Crimes (2010-2013)\r\n\r\nFigure h: District-wise reported IPC and SLL Crimes\r\n\r\nFigure i: District-wise reported crimes in 2015 (Break-up of IPC Crimes)\r\n\r\nFigure j: Gender of the accused in 3 districts\r\n\r\nFigure k: Outcome of first productions\r\n\r\nFigure l: Statutory basis of offences and outcomes of first productions\r\n\r\nFigure m: Nature of offences in each district\r\n\r\nFigure n: Outcome of first productions based on nature of offences in Bengaluru\r\n\r\nFigure o: Outcome of first productions - Bailable v. Non-Bailable\r\n\r\nFigure p: Presence of lawyer and outcome of first productions\r\n\r\nFigure q: Accused had no lawyer and informed of free legal aid\r\n\r\nFigure r: Bail application filed where lawyer was present\r\n\r\nFigure s: Bail applications filed and outcome of first production\r\n\r\nFigure t: Percentage of accused in handcuffs\r\n\r\nFigure u: Relationship between bail outcomes and whether accused was allowed to address the court\r\n\r\nFigure v: Time spent on a case v. outcome of first productions\r\n\r\nFigure w: Outcome of first production in Court Observations and Court Records\r\n\r\nFigure x: Statutory Basis and Classification of Offences: Court Observations and Court Records in Bengaluru\r\n\r\nFigure y: Nature of IPC offences in Court Observations and Court Records from Bengaluru\r\n\r\nFigure z: Outcome of first production in IPC and SLL cases in Bengaluru\r\n\r\nFigure aa: Outcomes of first productions in bailable and non-bailable cases in Bengaluru\r\n\r\nFigure bb: Presence of lawyer and filing of bail applications in Court Observations and Court Records in Bengaluru\r\n\r\nFigure cc: Bail outcomes based on whether lawyer present and bail application filed in Bengaluru\r\n\r\nFigure dd: Percentage of arrests made\r\n\r\nFigure ee: Stages in which bail was granted\r\n\r\nFigure ff: Duration spent in police custody\r\n\r\nFigure gg: Duration spent in judicial custody\r\n\r\nFigure hh: Institution that granted bail\r\n\r\nFigure ii: Range of punishment and outcome of first production\r\n\r\nFigure jj: Relationship between range of punishment and bail in the pre-trial stage where an accused was held in judicial custody and police custody\r\n\r\nFigure kk: Total arrests made out of all FIRs filed\r\n\r\nFigure ll: Cases where police bail was granted\r\n\r\nFigure mm: Police bail in Bailable and Non-Bailable cases\r\n\r\nFigure nn: Bail outcomes at first production\r\n\r\nFigure oo: Statutory basis for offences in Dharwad and Tumakuru\r\n\r\nFigure pp: Number of days of judicial custody ordered at first production\r\n\r\nFigure qq: Bail in the pre-trial stage\r\n\r\nFigure rr: Institutions that granted bail\r\n\r\nFigure ss: IPC and SLL cases in the pre-trial stage\r\n\r\nFigure tt: Pre-trial bail outcomes in IPC and SLL cases\r\n\r\nFigure uu: Nature of offences in the pre-trial stage\r\n\r\nFigure vv: Pre-trial bail outcomes according to nature of offence\r\n\r\nFigure ww: Pre-trial cases based on range of punishment\r\n\r\nFigure xx: Pre-trial bail outcomes according to range of punishment","rendered":"

LIST OF TABLES <\/strong><\/p>\n

Table 1: Overview of the number of cases observed<\/p>\n

Table 2: Overview of the number of case records obtained<\/p>\n

Table 3: Education Profile of under-trial Prisoners in Karnataka in 2015<\/p>\n

Table 4: Religious Profile of under-trial prisoners in Karnataka in 2015<\/p>\n

Table 5: Caste profile of under-trial prisoners in Karnataka in 2015<\/p>\n

Table 6: Overview of first productions study<\/p>\n

Table 7: Number of IPC and SLL cases<\/p>\n

Table 8: Accused informed of free legal aid<\/p>\n

Table 9: Number of bail applications filed<\/p>\n

Table 10: Accused in handcuffs and outcome<\/p>\n

Table 11: Median time and Average time spent by the judge in each district<\/p>\n

Table 12: Other outcomes observed in the pre-trial study (only Court Records)<\/p>\n

Table 13: Number of accused in the pre-trial stage<\/p>\n

\n

LIST OF FIGURES<\/strong><\/p>\n

Figure a: Average crime rate per district in Karnataka from 2010-13<\/p>\n

Figure b: Under-trial prisoners in Karnataka (2010-2015)<\/p>\n

Figure c: Details of under-trials released on bail in Karnataka (2010 \u2013 2015)<\/p>\n

Figure d: Number of reported crimes in Karnataka (2010-2015)<\/p>\n

Figure e: Number of arrests in Karnataka (2010-2015)<\/p>\n

Figure f: Total number of arrests in Karnataka categorised offence-wise (2010-2015)<\/p>\n

Figure g: District-wise reported IPC Crimes (2010-2013)<\/p>\n

Figure h: District-wise reported IPC and SLL Crimes<\/p>\n

Figure i: District-wise reported crimes in 2015 (Break-up of IPC Crimes)<\/p>\n

Figure j: Gender of the accused in 3 districts<\/p>\n

Figure k: Outcome of first productions<\/p>\n

Figure l: Statutory basis of offences and outcomes of first productions<\/p>\n

Figure m: Nature of offences in each district<\/p>\n

Figure n: Outcome of first productions based on nature of offences in Bengaluru<\/p>\n

Figure o: Outcome of first productions – Bailable v. Non-Bailable<\/p>\n

Figure p: Presence of lawyer and outcome of first productions<\/p>\n

Figure q: Accused had no lawyer and informed of free legal aid<\/p>\n

Figure r: Bail application filed where lawyer was present<\/p>\n

Figure s: Bail applications filed and outcome of first production<\/p>\n

Figure t: Percentage of accused in handcuffs<\/p>\n

Figure u: Relationship between bail outcomes and whether accused was allowed to address the court<\/p>\n

Figure v: Time spent on a case v. outcome of first productions<\/p>\n

Figure w: Outcome of first production in Court Observations and Court Records<\/p>\n

Figure x: Statutory Basis and Classification of Offences: Court Observations and Court Records in Bengaluru<\/p>\n

Figure y: Nature of IPC offences in Court Observations and Court Records from Bengaluru<\/p>\n

Figure z: Outcome of first production in IPC and SLL cases in Bengaluru<\/p>\n

Figure aa: Outcomes of first productions in bailable and non-bailable cases in Bengaluru<\/p>\n

Figure bb: Presence of lawyer and filing of bail applications in Court Observations and Court Records in Bengaluru<\/p>\n

Figure cc: Bail outcomes based on whether lawyer present and bail application filed in Bengaluru<\/p>\n

Figure dd: Percentage of arrests made<\/p>\n

Figure ee: Stages in which bail was granted<\/p>\n

Figure ff: Duration spent in police custody<\/p>\n

Figure gg: Duration spent in judicial custody<\/p>\n

Figure hh: Institution that granted bail<\/p>\n

Figure ii: Range of punishment and outcome of first production<\/p>\n

Figure jj: Relationship between range of punishment and bail in the pre-trial stage where an accused was held in judicial custody and police custody<\/p>\n

Figure kk: Total arrests made out of all FIRs filed<\/p>\n

Figure ll: Cases where police bail was granted<\/p>\n

Figure mm: Police bail in Bailable and Non-Bailable cases<\/p>\n

Figure nn: Bail outcomes at first production<\/p>\n

Figure oo: Statutory basis for offences in Dharwad and Tumakuru<\/p>\n

Figure pp: Number of days of judicial custody ordered at first production<\/p>\n

Figure qq: Bail in the pre-trial stage<\/p>\n

Figure rr: Institutions that granted bail<\/p>\n

Figure ss: IPC and SLL cases in the pre-trial stage<\/p>\n

Figure tt: Pre-trial bail outcomes in IPC and SLL cases<\/p>\n

Figure uu: Nature of offences in the pre-trial stage<\/p>\n

Figure vv: Pre-trial bail outcomes according to nature of offence<\/p>\n

Figure ww: Pre-trial cases based on range of punishment<\/p>\n

Figure xx: Pre-trial bail outcomes according to range of punishment<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"menu_order":3,"template":"","meta":{"inline_featured_image":false,"pb_show_title":"on","pb_short_title":"","pb_subtitle":"","pb_authors":[],"pb_section_license":""},"front-matter-type":[],"contributor":[],"license":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.clpr.org.in\/re-imagining-bail-decision-making\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/front-matter\/196"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.clpr.org.in\/re-imagining-bail-decision-making\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/front-matter"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.clpr.org.in\/re-imagining-bail-decision-making\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/front-matter"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.clpr.org.in\/re-imagining-bail-decision-making\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/publications.clpr.org.in\/re-imagining-bail-decision-making\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/front-matter\/196\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":197,"href":"https:\/\/publications.clpr.org.in\/re-imagining-bail-decision-making\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/front-matter\/196\/revisions\/197"}],"metadata":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.clpr.org.in\/re-imagining-bail-decision-making\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/front-matter\/196\/metadata\/"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/publications.clpr.org.in\/re-imagining-bail-decision-making\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=196"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"front-matter-type","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.clpr.org.in\/re-imagining-bail-decision-making\/wp-json\/pressbooks\/v2\/front-matter-type?post=196"},{"taxonomy":"contributor","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.clpr.org.in\/re-imagining-bail-decision-making\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/contributor?post=196"},{"taxonomy":"license","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/publications.clpr.org.in\/re-imagining-bail-decision-making\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/license?post=196"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}